10%-marker
40px-marker

table width:auto;

1.a. table width:auto; sum of % is 90, where is this width coming from?

10%
50%
30%

1.a.1 table width:auto; sum of % is 90, but first column has different intrinsic dim, where is this width coming from?

10%---
50%
30%

1.b. table width:auto; sum of % is 9, why width of the table is so dramatically different from 1.a case?

1%
5%
3%

1.b.1 table width:auto; sum of % is 9. but first column has different intrinsic dim, why is it different from the case 1.b (in Gecko and WebKit)?

1%---
5%
3%

1.c. table width:auto; sum of % is 100%. Width of the table anyone?

10%
50%
40%

table width:100%;

2.a. table width:100%; sum of % is 90

10%
50%
30%

2.b. table width:100%; sum of % is 9, why cells dimensions are different from case 2.a in Gecko?

1%
5%
3%

2.c. table width:100%; sum of % is 100%

10%
50%
40%

table width:auto + fixed column

3.a. table width:auto; sum of % is 90, where is this width comes from?

40px
10%
50%
30%

3.a.1 table width:auto; sum of % is 90, but first % column has different intrinsic dim... Why 40px here is different from 40px above?

40px
10%---
50%
30%

3.b. table width:auto; sum of % is 9, why width of the table is different from 1.a case?

40px
1%
5%
3%

3.b.1 table width:auto; sum of % is 9. but first column has different intrinsic dim, why it is different from the case 1.b (in Gecko and WebKit)?

40px
1%---
5%
3%

3.c. table width:auto; sum of % is 100%. Width of the table anyone?

40px
10%
50%
40%

table width:100% + fixed column

4.a. sum of % is 90

40px
10%
50%
30%

4.a.1 sum of % is 90

40px
10%---
50%
30%

4.b. sum of % is 9

40px
1%
5%
3%

4.b.1 sum of % is 9

40px
1%---
5%
3%

4.c. is 100%.

40px
10%
50%
40%

4.c.1 is 99%. Why this is so different from 4.b? Some magic triggers this difference?

40px
10%
50%
39%